SuperCompress

Comparison · Updated 2026-10-31

SuperCompress vs claude-token-efficient

Short answer: claude-token-efficient is instruction file (CLAUDE.md rules). Where it runs: Inside Claude Code, as a project file. SuperCompress is hosted, query-aware compression that keeps the original lines answering the current question. Pick claude-token-efficient if you want the lightest possible experiment in Claude Code with nothing to install. Pick SuperCompress if your agent keeps pulling big tool results, logs or retrieved docs and only a few lines matter for the question at hand, and you want those lines kept verbatim.

Side by side

claude-token-efficientSuperCompress
What it optimizesModel output styleInput context (tool output, logs, files, MCP results, RAG)
How it decidesInstruction file (CLAUDE.md rules)Query-aware extraction of original lines
Where it runsInside Claude Code, as a project fileHosted API, plus an MCP tool and hooks for coding agents
SetupCopy CLAUDE.md into your project rootnpm install -g supercompress-proxy && supercompress setup
LicenceOpen sourceHosted service

claude-token-efficient

A. claude-token-efficient

Best if you want the lightest possible experiment in Claude Code with nothing to install.

A drop-in CLAUDE.md with compact behaviour rules that suppress filler, restated questions and over-engineering in Claude Code replies.

Strengths:

Limitations:

SuperCompress

B. SuperCompress (our product)

Best if your agent keeps pulling big tool results, logs or retrieved docs and only a few lines matter for the question at hand, and you want those lines kept verbatim.

Hosted, query-aware context compression. Your agent or app sends a bulky block (tool output, a log, a diff, a file read, an MCP result, retrieved docs) with the current question, and the hosted Neural Keep model keeps the original lines that answer it, word for word, and drops the rest.

Strengths:

Limitations:

How to test any of these fairly

Every tool here, including ours, publishes its own numbers. Fewer tokens do not always mean a smaller bill once prompt caching, retries and extra agent turns are counted. Run the same tasks with and without a tool, check the tasks still succeed, and compare cost per finished task on your provider bill.

Disclosure: SuperCompress publishes this page and is listed first because it is ours. Every claim about other tools comes from their own docs or repositories as of 2026-10-31; tell us if anything is out of date and we will fix it.

See also: claude-token-efficient alternatives, all comparisons.

FAQ

Is SuperCompress better than claude-token-efficient?

They solve different parts of the problem. Best if you want the lightest possible experiment in Claude Code with nothing to install. Best if your agent keeps pulling big tool results, logs or retrieved docs and only a few lines matter for the question at hand, and you want those lines kept verbatim.

What is the main difference between SuperCompress and claude-token-efficient?

claude-token-efficient works on model output style and runs inside claude code, as a project file. SuperCompress works on input context and is hosted.

Can I use both?

Usually, if they act on different tokens. Measure cost per finished task with each on and off.

Get API key Coding agents guide All comparisons